Age in seconds
Calculating...
New York City

At the intersection of human potential and data-driven strategy lies the future I'm crafting.

Transforming business operations through analytical precision and strategic vision across New York City's most dynamic companies.

Case Studies

The Paradox of Choice: Finding the Optimal Product Selection Range

8-12
Optimal Number of Product Options
+18%
Conversion Rate Improvement
+$3.2M
Annual Revenue Impact

Business Challenge

An e-commerce client was struggling with high cart abandonment rates and low conversion. Initial hypotheses suggested customers were overwhelmed by excessive product options, creating decision paralysis. The key question: what is the optimal number of product options to maximize both customer satisfaction and purchase completion?

Methodology

I conducted a controlled A/B test across 6 different product selection ranges (1-4, 5-7, 8-12, 13-20, 21-30, and 31+ options) using:

  • Sample size: 24,000 customers across 3 months
  • Balanced demographics and purchase history
  • Tracked: satisfaction ratings, completion rates, average order value
  • Control variables: price points, product quality, page layout

Analysis & Findings

The data revealed a clear relationship between choice quantity and customer behavior. Too few options left customers unsatisfied, while too many options created decision fatigue and abandonment.

Product Range Satisfaction Completion Rate AOV Time to Decision
1-4 options 7.2/10 81% $42.35 2.1 min
5-7 options 8.1/10 87% $48.72 3.5 min
8-12 options 8.7/10 92% $54.18 4.8 min
13-20 options 7.6/10 85% $52.64 7.2 min
21-30 options 6.9/10 79% $49.51 9.7 min
31+ options 6.4/10 69% $44.89 11.4 min

Business Impact & Recommendations

After implementing the optimal 8-12 product options strategy in our highest-traffic categories:

  • Conversion rates increased by 18% within the first month
  • Customer satisfaction scores improved by 23%
  • Average time to purchase decreased by 32%
  • Projected annual revenue impact: $3.2 million

Based on these findings, I recommended:

  1. Restructure all product category pages to display 8-12 options initially
  2. Add "View More" functionality for customers who want additional choices
  3. Implement smart filtering to help users navigate larger catalogs effectively
  4. Create curated collections for different user segments based on demographics and behavior patterns

Social Media Engagement Decay: Platform-Specific Content Longevity

4hrs
Twitter Half-Life
21hrs
Instagram Half-Life
48hrs
LinkedIn Half-Life

Business Challenge

A digital marketing agency was struggling to optimize their clients' social media content calendars. With limited resources, they needed to understand how long content remained effective on different platforms to create more efficient posting schedules and content strategies.

Methodology

I analyzed 18 months of social media data across three platforms (Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn) including:

  • Sample: 12,500+ posts across 28 brand accounts
  • Engagement metrics: likes, comments, shares, clicks, saves
  • Content variables: type (video, image, text), topic, posting time, day of week
  • Normalized engagement based on follower count and platform expectations

Analysis & Findings

The analysis revealed distinctive engagement decay patterns for each platform, with content types having a significant impact on longevity. Key findings:

Platform Half-Life Top Content Type Peak Posting Time Posts Per Week
Instagram 21 hours Carousel Images 8PM-10PM 3-4
Twitter 4 hours Text + Image 12PM-1PM 15-21
LinkedIn 48 hours Long-form Text 9AM-11AM 2-3

Business Impact & Recommendations

After implementing platform-specific posting strategies based on engagement half-lives:

  • Overall engagement increased by 34% with no increase in content production
  • Resource allocation efficiency improved by 28%
  • Client-reported satisfaction with social media services increased by 42%

Strategic recommendations:

  1. Twitter: Focus on high-frequency, time-sensitive content; schedule multiple daily posts aligned with breaking news
  2. Instagram: Prioritize quality over quantity with carousel posts for extended engagement
  3. LinkedIn: Publish thought leadership content 2-3 times weekly, focusing on weekday mornings
  4. Content recycling strategy: Repurpose evergreen content based on platform-specific half-lives

Cricket Toss Analysis: Quantifying the Advantage of Winning the Toss

62.1%
Subcontinent Win Rate
58.7%
Day-Night Test Rate
14%
Advantage Variance by Team

Business Challenge

A sports analytics firm needed to understand the true impact of the coin toss in cricket to improve predictive modeling and betting strategies. The question: to what extent does winning the toss influence match outcomes across different formats and conditions?

Methodology

I analyzed 20 years of international cricket matches, including:

  • Sample: 2,845 matches across all formats (Test, ODI, T20I)
  • Variables: format, toss winner, match winner, venue, time of day, weather conditions
  • Regional factors: pitch conditions, home advantage, historical performance
  • Statistical methods: logistic regression, significance testing, multivariate analysis

Analysis & Findings

The data revealed that toss impact varies significantly by format and region, with particularly strong effects in subcontinent matches and day-night tests.

Format Toss Win % With Rain Home Team Away Team
Test 53.2% 58.6% 56.4% 50.1%
Day-Night Test 58.7% 62.3% 61.9% 54.2%
ODI 51.4% 55.7% 53.8% 49.1%
T20I 48.9% 52.8% 51.3% 47.2%
Subcontinent 62.1% 67.3% 71.5% 52.7%

Business Impact & Recommendations

The analysis transformed the client's predictive modeling capabilities:

  • Predictive accuracy improved by 14% for subcontinent matches
  • Betting strategy ROI increased by 22% when factoring in toss results
  • New "toss-adjusted" rating system developed for team performance evaluation

Strategic recommendations:

  1. Weight toss outcomes heavily in subcontinent and day-night match predictions
  2. Develop team-specific toss advantage profiles for more nuanced modeling
  3. Consider weather forecasts when evaluating toss impact for upcoming matches
  4. Create a composite "environmental advantage" metric combining toss outcome, venue, and conditions

Background

Boston University
Economics

Where my data-driven journey began, developing strong analytical foundations and economic theory that continues to inform my approach to problem-solving.